Betashares ATEC Estimates 151% Capital Gains Component in 2025 Distribution

Betashares Capital Ltd has released the estimated annual distribution components for its S&P/ASX Australian Technology ETF (ATEC) for the 2024-25 financial year, highlighting a nuanced mix of income types and tax adjustments under the AMIT regime.

  • Estimated cash distribution set at 100%
  • Significant capital gains component attributed at over 150%
  • Franking credits and Australian dividends form key income sources
  • Substantial negative AMIT cost base adjustment impacting tax calculations
  • No foreign income or capital gains reported for the period
An image related to Unknown
Image source middle. ©

Overview of Distribution Components

Betashares Capital Ltd has disclosed the estimated annual distribution breakdown for its S&P/ASX Australian Technology ETF (ASX – ATEC) for the financial year ending 30 June 2025. This announcement provides investors with a detailed view of the income types, capital gains, tax offsets, and adjustments that underpin the fund's distributions under the Attribution Managed Investment Trust (AMIT) tax framework.

The fund estimates a full 100% cash distribution to unitholders, reflecting a commitment to returning income generated by the underlying assets. Notably, the distribution includes a substantial capital gains component, with discounted capital gains on non-taxable Australian property accounting for approximately 151.3% of the distribution. This figure suggests that capital gains form a significant part of the fund's returns, which may have implications for investors’ tax positions.

Income and Tax Components

Dividends from Australian companies contribute meaningfully to the distribution, with franked dividends representing 7.79% and unfranked dividends at 2.49%. Franking credits, which provide tax credits to investors for corporate tax already paid, are estimated at 7.03%, enhancing the after-tax value of distributions for Australian resident investors.

Interestingly, the fund reports no foreign income or capital gains for the period, indicating a focus on domestic Australian assets within the technology sector. This absence of foreign-sourced income simplifies the tax treatment for many investors but also reflects the fund's investment strategy and market exposure.

AMIT Cost Base Adjustments and Implications

A notable feature of the distribution breakdown is the significant negative AMIT cost base adjustment of -218.02%. This adjustment reflects the difference between the cash distributed and the taxable income attributed to unitholders, a common occurrence under the AMIT regime. Such adjustments can affect the cost base of units held by investors, influencing capital gains calculations upon future disposals.

Investors should be aware that the final tax components will be confirmed in the Attribution Managed Investment Trust Member Annual (AMMA) statements issued separately. These statements are crucial for accurate tax reporting and understanding the precise tax implications of the distributions received.

Looking Ahead

As the fund continues to navigate the evolving technology sector landscape, the composition of distributions and associated tax components will remain key considerations for investors. The detailed breakdown provided by Betashares offers transparency but also underscores the complexity of tax treatment under the AMIT framework.

Investors are encouraged to consult professional tax advice to fully understand the impact of these distributions on their individual circumstances, especially given the significant capital gains and cost base adjustments involved.

Bottom Line?

Betashares ATEC’s detailed distribution breakdown signals a complex tax landscape ahead for investors navigating AMIT-managed ETFs.

Questions in the middle?

  • How will the significant negative AMIT cost base adjustment affect investors’ future capital gains tax liabilities?
  • Will the fund’s focus on Australian technology assets continue to exclude foreign income components in coming years?
  • How might changes in the technology sector impact the composition and size of future distributions?