How Woodside’s Louisiana LNG FID and Stonepeak Deal Unlock New Growth
Woodside Energy reported a 2% rise in quarterly production and lowered unit costs, while the Louisiana LNG Project’s final investment decision and a major Stonepeak partnership unlock significant future value.
- Quarterly production up 2% to 50.1 million barrels of oil equivalent
- Louisiana LNG Project FID reached; 40% interest sold to Stonepeak for $1.9 billion
- Full-year production guidance raised to 188-195 MMboe; unit costs lowered to $8.0-$8.5/boe
- Beaumont New Ammonia Project 95% complete, targeting late 2025 production
- Exited H2OK hydrogen project, recognizing $140 million impairment loss
Operational Momentum and Production Growth
Woodside Energy has delivered a solid second quarter for 2025, with production climbing 2% to 50.1 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMboe). This growth was underpinned by the Sangomar field’s exceptional performance, which maintained near-plateau production at 101,000 barrels per day with 99.6% reliability. The company’s diversified portfolio continues to generate strong revenue, with a realised LNG price of $62 per barrel of oil equivalent, reflecting strategic pricing linked to gas hub indices and optimisation efforts.
Louisiana LNG Project, A Strategic Leap Forward
The highlight of Woodside’s quarter is the final investment decision (FID) for the Louisiana LNG Project, a three-train facility with a capacity of 16.5 million tonnes per annum. This milestone unlocks significant long-term value and positions Woodside as a global LNG powerhouse. Crucially, Woodside completed the sale of a 40% stake in the project’s infrastructure to Stonepeak for approximately $1.9 billion, with Stonepeak assuming 75% of capital expenditure since January 2025. This partnership notably reduces Woodside’s capital risk and enhances financial flexibility.
Woodside also secured long-term LNG sale agreements with Uniper and signed a collaboration agreement with Aramco, which includes potential equity participation and LNG offtake from Louisiana LNG, as well as cooperation on lower-carbon ammonia initiatives. These deals underscore the project’s strategic importance and Woodside’s commitment to expanding its global footprint.
Project Progress and Cost Discipline
Woodside’s major projects remain on track, with the Scarborough Energy Project 86% complete and targeting first LNG cargo in the second half of 2026. The Trion Project offshore Mexico is 35% complete, aiming for first oil in 2028. Meanwhile, the Beaumont New Ammonia Project is nearing completion at 95%, with first ammonia production expected late this year.
Operational efficiency is evident in Woodside’s decision to lower its full-year unit production cost guidance to $8.0-$8.5 per barrel of oil equivalent, down from $8.5-$9.2. This reflects strong production and cost performance in the first half of 2025. The company also demonstrated capital discipline by issuing $3.5 billion in senior unsecured bonds in the US market, which were heavily oversubscribed, and maintaining liquidity of approximately $8.4 billion at quarter-end.
Portfolio Management and Sustainability Focus
Woodside completed the divestment of its Greater Angostura assets for $259 million, streamlining its portfolio and strengthening its balance sheet. The company also exited the H2OK hydrogen project due to industry challenges, recognizing an impairment loss of about $140 million pre-tax. This move reflects Woodside’s disciplined approach to portfolio management amid evolving energy markets.
On the sustainability front, Woodside remains on track to meet its target of reducing net equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions by 15% by 2025. The company is advancing carbon capture and storage projects and new energy initiatives, including participation in the NeoSmelt Project aimed at lower-carbon iron production.
Looking Ahead
While Woodside’s operational and financial performance is robust, the company faces ongoing challenges such as legal proceedings related to the Scarborough project and increased decommissioning costs offshore Australia. These factors, along with market dynamics and regulatory developments, will be critical to monitor as Woodside progresses its ambitious growth and sustainability agenda.
Bottom Line?
Woodside’s strategic partnerships and disciplined execution set the stage for a transformative growth phase, but upcoming regulatory and cost challenges warrant close attention.
Questions in the middle?
- How will the Stonepeak partnership influence Woodside’s future capital allocation and project risk profile?
- What impact will the legal challenge to the Scarborough project have on its timeline and costs?
- How will Woodside balance growth ambitions with rising decommissioning expenses and sustainability commitments?