Legal Battle Escalates as Mayne Pharma Rejects Cosette’s Contract Termination Claims

Mayne Pharma has firmly rejected a fresh termination notice from Cosette Pharmaceuticals alleging breaches related to FDA disclosure, escalating an ongoing contractual dispute with significant legal implications.

  • Cosette alleges Mayne Pharma breached scheme implementation deed over FDA Untitled Letter disclosures
  • Mayne Pharma denies any new disclosure obligations and rejects termination notice as invalid
  • Dispute centers on interpretation of continuous disclosure and misleading conduct clauses
  • Mayne Pharma intends to enforce rights through ongoing court proceedings
  • Shareholders advised no immediate action required amid legal uncertainty
An image related to MAYNE PHARMA GROUP LIMITED
Image source middle. ©

Background to the Dispute

Mayne Pharma Group Limited (ASX – MYX) finds itself embroiled in a deepening legal and contractual conflict with Cosette Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The dispute revolves around a scheme implementation deed (SID) signed earlier this year, which Cosette has sought to terminate multiple times since June 2025. The latest development, announced on 5 August, involves Cosette alleging a new breach by Mayne Pharma related to disclosures surrounding an FDA Untitled Letter issued in May.

The Latest Allegations and Response

Cosette’s August notice accuses Mayne Pharma of misleading or deceptive conduct and failing to meet continuous disclosure obligations under clause 7.1(b) of the SID. This is a fresh claim not included in prior termination notices issued in June. Cosette has warned it may terminate the SID if the alleged breach persists beyond five business days, effectively threatening to unravel the deal if Mayne Pharma does not comply.

Mayne Pharma, however, has categorically rejected these allegations. The company maintains that all relevant information concerning the FDA Untitled Letter was fully disclosed in its May and June announcements. It views Cosette’s new termination notice as invalid and without lawful basis, signaling its intent to vigorously defend its position through ongoing court proceedings initiated in early June.

Implications for Mayne Pharma and Shareholders

This dispute places Mayne Pharma at a critical juncture. The company’s insistence on full compliance and rejection of termination attempts underscores its confidence but also highlights the legal complexities involved. For shareholders, the message is clear – no immediate action is required, but the situation remains fluid and subject to judicial interpretation.

Given Mayne Pharma’s focus on specialty pharmaceuticals and its established presence in dermatology and women’s health markets, the outcome of this dispute could influence its strategic trajectory and investor confidence. The ongoing litigation and contractual uncertainty may weigh on the company’s market perception in the near term.

Looking Ahead

As the legal battle unfolds, market participants will be watching closely for any court rulings or further disclosures that clarify the enforceability of the SID and the validity of Cosette’s termination attempts. The case also raises broader questions about disclosure standards and contractual protections in complex pharmaceutical mergers and acquisitions.

Bottom Line?

Mayne Pharma’s firm rebuttal sets the stage for a high-stakes legal showdown with Cosette that could reshape its corporate future.

Questions in the middle?

  • Will the court uphold Mayne Pharma’s rejection of Cosette’s termination notices?
  • Could new disclosures or regulatory developments alter the legal dynamics of the SID?
  • What impact will this dispute have on Mayne Pharma’s strategic partnerships and market valuation?