Court Delays Equinox’s Hamersley Project Decision to 17 October 2025
Equinox Resources' judicial review over the Hamersley Iron Ore Project has been adjourned to 17 October 2025, as the Supreme Court seeks clarity on mapping and boundary data used by the Committee. The outcome remains uncertain as affidavit evidence is awaited.
- Judicial review hearing held on 26 September 2025
- Court adjourned proceedings to 17 October 2025
- Focus on sufficiency of boundary certainty for two sites
- Request for affidavit evidence on mapping and boundary data
- Potential impact on Hamersley Iron Ore Project approval process
Background to the Judicial Review
Equinox Resources Limited (ASX – EQN) is currently navigating a critical legal juncture concerning its Hamersley Iron Ore Project. The Supreme Court recently heard a judicial review application challenging the Committee's decision related to this project. The hearing, held on 26 September 2025, was adjourned to allow further evidence to be submitted, underscoring the complexity and significance of the issues at hand.
Court’s Focus on Boundary Certainty
The Court’s primary concern during the hearing was whether the Committee had sufficient certainty regarding the boundaries of two key sites involved in the project. This issue is pivotal because clear and legally recognized boundaries are essential for regulatory approvals and subsequent development activities. The Court requested detailed evidence clarifying the nature of the mapping information and boundary data that the Committee relied upon when making its decision.
Next Steps – Affidavit Evidence and Department Data
To address these questions, the parties involved have been given until 17 October 2025 to file affidavit evidence. This evidence will focus on what mapping information and boundary data were presented to the Committee, including whether the maps were tied to unique identifiers capable of providing clear and unambiguous boundaries. The Court has also indicated that this information may be sought directly from the relevant Department, either by consent or subpoena, highlighting the procedural rigor of the review.
Implications for Equinox and the Hamersley Project
This adjournment and the scrutiny over boundary data introduce a layer of uncertainty around the project’s regulatory timeline. While the judicial review process unfolds, Equinox must manage investor expectations and maintain momentum on its broader strategic objectives. The outcome of this review could influence not only the project’s approval but also set precedents for how boundary data is treated in future mining approvals.
Looking Ahead
Investors and market watchers will be closely monitoring the developments leading up to the resumed hearing on 17 October. The affidavit evidence submitted will be critical in shaping the Court’s final decision and, by extension, the future trajectory of the Hamersley Iron Ore Project.
Bottom Line?
The next hearing on 17 October will be a pivotal moment for Equinox’s Hamersley project, with boundary data clarity at the heart of the legal challenge.
Questions in the middle?
- What specific mapping data will the Department provide to clarify boundary uncertainties?
- How might the Court’s decision affect the timeline and viability of the Hamersley Iron Ore Project?
- Could this judicial review set a precedent impacting other mining approvals reliant on boundary data?
