Viridis Mining’s Colossus Project Faces Regulatory Scrutiny but Stays Confident

Viridis Mining and Minerals Limited has addressed ASX concerns following unusual trading linked to a Brazilian environmental recommendation on its Colossus Project. The company remains confident in securing the project's Preliminary License despite the non-binding recommendation.

  • ASX queried Viridis over sharp share price drop and trading volume spike
  • Brazilian prosecutors issued a non-binding recommendation on environmental license
  • Viridis asserts recommendation based on outdated information, maintains regulatory compliance
  • Company requested trading halt and voluntary suspension to clarify situation
  • Viridis confirms full compliance with ASX continuous disclosure rules
An image related to VIRIDIS MINING AND MINERALS LIMITED
Image source middle. ©

Background to the Trading Volatility

Shares in Viridis Mining and Minerals Limited (ASX, VMM) experienced a significant price drop from $1.395 to an intraday low of $0.925 between 25 and 26 November 2025, accompanied by a surge in trading volume. This unusual market activity prompted the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) to seek clarification from Viridis regarding any undisclosed information that might explain the volatility.

The Brazilian Environmental Recommendation

At the heart of the market’s concern was a recommendation issued on 24 November 2025 by Brazil’s public prosecutors’ office (MPF) to the Minas Gerais State Environmental Foundation (FEAM). This recommendation related to the Preliminary License (LP) approval process for Viridis’s Colossus Project, a key development in the company’s portfolio. The recommendation was to be considered at the Minas Gerais State Environmental Policy Council (COPAM) meeting scheduled for 28 November 2025.

Viridis clarified that the MPF’s recommendation is non-binding and serves as a suggestion rather than a directive. The company emphasized that FEAM’s prior technical assessments have been favorable and that the concerns raised by the MPF were based on outdated or incorrect assumptions. Viridis highlighted that these issues had already been addressed through extensive environmental impact assessments, public hearings, and submissions during the licensing process.

Company Response and Regulatory Compliance

Upon becoming aware of the recommendation and the subsequent market reaction, Viridis promptly engaged with the ASX and requested a trading halt on 26 November 2025 to provide time for consultation with FEAM and to consider any necessary disclosures. Following this, the company also requested a voluntary suspension on 28 November 2025 to formulate a comprehensive response.

Viridis confirmed that it has complied fully with ASX Listing Rules, particularly continuous disclosure obligations under Listing Rule 3.1. The company’s board approved the responses to the ASX query, underscoring its commitment to transparency and regulatory adherence.

Implications for the Colossus Project

Despite the MPF’s recommendation, Viridis remains confident in the environmental robustness of the Colossus Project and its clear pathway to securing the Preliminary License. The company pointed to strong support from various levels of the Brazilian government and FEAM’s documented favorable technical assessments as key factors underpinning this confidence.

However, the situation underscores the complexities of navigating environmental regulatory frameworks in international jurisdictions and the potential for market sensitivity to procedural developments. Investors will be watching closely for the outcome of the COPAM meeting and any further regulatory updates.

Bottom Line?

Viridis’s handling of the environmental licensing query highlights the delicate balance between regulatory processes and market confidence in mining ventures.

Questions in the middle?

  • Will FEAM’s final decision on the Preliminary License align with Viridis’s optimistic outlook?
  • Could further regulatory scrutiny or updated environmental concerns emerge affecting project timelines?
  • How will the market respond to ongoing developments and Viridis’s disclosure strategy?