HomeEnergyMelbana Energy (ASX:MAY)

How Melbana Energy’s Executive Chairman Avoids Re-election Under ASX Rules

Energy By Maxwell Dee 3 min read

Melbana Energy has confirmed that its Executive Chairman, Andrew Purcell, is exempt from re-election under ASX Listing Rule 14.4, following a detailed response to ASX's compliance query.

  • Andrew Purcell last re-elected as director in 2018
  • Appointed Executive Chairman in February 2020 with managing director-equivalent powers
  • ASX Listing Rule 14.4 exempts managing directors from re-election requirements
  • Company affirms compliance with Listing Rules and Corporations Act provisions
  • Disclosure of Purcell’s remuneration and performance rights under service agreement

Background and ASX Query

Melbana Energy Limited (ASX – MAY) recently addressed a formal query from the Australian Securities Exchange regarding the tenure and re-election obligations of its Executive Chairman, Andrew Purcell. The ASX sought clarification on whether Purcell’s appointment as Executive Chairman exempts him from the usual director rotation and re-election requirements under Listing Rule 14.4.

Director Tenure and Appointment Details

Melbana confirmed that Mr Purcell was last re-elected as a director at the company’s 2018 Annual General Meeting and has continuously held office since then. In February 2020, the Board appointed him as Executive Chairman, a role created under the company’s constitution that confers executive management responsibilities equivalent to those of a managing director.

This appointment grants Purcell operational control and strategic oversight, making him the principal executive officer accountable to the Board. Melbana emphasised that the substance of his role aligns with market practice where titles such as Executive Chairman or CEO are treated equivalently to managing director for governance purposes.

Compliance with ASX Listing Rules

Listing Rule 14.4 exempts managing directors from the requirement to stand for re-election every three years or at every third AGM. Melbana argues that since Purcell’s appointment to the executive office in 2020, this exemption applies, and therefore he is not required to submit for re-election while holding this position.

The company supported this position by referencing relevant provisions of the Corporations Act and its own constitution, which empower the Board to appoint directors to executive roles and confer management powers accordingly. Melbana also disclosed key terms of Purcell’s service agreement, including fixed remuneration of $581,820 per annum and performance rights under a long-term incentive plan.

Implications and Market Context

This clarification underscores Melbana’s commitment to transparent governance and compliance with ASX requirements. By focusing on the substance of executive roles rather than formal titles, the company aligns with broader market practice and regulatory expectations.

Investors and governance watchers will be attentive to how the ASX responds to this interpretation, as it may influence how other companies structure and disclose executive appointments relative to director rotation rules.

Bottom Line?

Melbana’s stance on executive tenure sets a precedent that could shape director re-election norms across the ASX.

Questions in the middle?

  • Will ASX formally accept Melbana’s interpretation of the Executive Chairman role as managing director equivalent?
  • Could this clarification prompt other ASX-listed companies to revisit their executive director appointments and disclosures?
  • How might this affect shareholder perceptions of board accountability and governance transparency at Melbana?