Central Petroleum’s Permit Sale Shift Raises Financial and Strategic Questions

Central Petroleum has amended its sub-salt exploration permit sale, excluding the EP82 permit and retaining Helium Australia Pty Ltd, while anticipating a $4.2 million impairment charge in FY26.

  • Exclusion of EP82 permit from sub-salt exploration sale
  • Retention of Helium Australia Pty Ltd by Central Petroleum
  • Withdrawal of Helium from EP82 Joint Venture with Santos
  • Focus shifted to EP112 and EP125 permits by Georgina Energy
  • Expected $4.2 million impairment charge in FY26 financials
An image related to CENTRAL PETROLEUM LIMITED
Image source middle. ©

Background on the Permit Sale

Central Petroleum Limited (ASX, CTP) has updated its previously announced sale of sub-salt exploration permits in the Northern Territory, a move that reshapes its asset portfolio and strategic focus. Initially, the sale included several permits, but after consultation with Georgina Energy Plc, Central has decided to exclude the EP82 permit, which contains the Magee/Mahler prospects. This adjustment means Central will retain ownership of its subsidiary, Helium Australia Pty Ltd, and withdraw from the EP82 Joint Venture with Santos.

Strategic Implications of Excluding EP82

The exclusion of EP82 allows Georgina Energy to concentrate its resources on the remaining two permits, EP112 (Dukas) and EP125 (Mt Kitty), which are located in the Amadeus and Officer Basins. These permits are larger and hold primary targets for helium, hydrogen, and hydrocarbons, aligning with the growing interest in alternative energy sources. Central’s decision to retain EP82 and Helium Australia suggests a continued commitment to exploring helium prospects within the Northern Territory, a sector gaining attention for its potential in the clean energy transition.

Financial Impact and Forward Outlook

As a consequence of withdrawing from the EP82 Joint Venture, Central expects to record an impairment charge of approximately $4.2 million in its FY26 financial statements. While this represents a notable write-down, the company maintains that other terms of the sale remain unchanged. The impairment reflects the reassessment of the asset’s value following the strategic shift but does not diminish Central’s broader ambitions in the region’s energy landscape.

Positioning in the Northern Territory Energy Market

Central Petroleum has established itself as a significant player in the Northern Territory’s oil and gas sector, with a growing portfolio that includes exploration and appraisal permits. The company is also positioning itself as a future supplier of hydrogen and helium, resources increasingly critical to Australia’s energy transition. Retaining EP82 and Helium Australia allows Central to maintain a foothold in helium exploration, which could prove valuable as demand for this rare gas expands globally.

Looking Ahead

The amended sale and the associated impairment charge mark a pivotal moment for Central Petroleum. The company’s ability to leverage its retained assets and collaborate with Georgina Energy on the remaining permits will be closely watched by investors. How Central balances its traditional hydrocarbons business with emerging energy opportunities will shape its trajectory in the coming years.

Bottom Line?

Central’s strategic pivot on EP82 signals a nuanced approach to balancing legacy assets with emerging energy prospects.

Questions in the middle?

  • What are Central Petroleum’s long-term plans for Helium Australia and the EP82 permit?
  • How will Georgina Energy’s focus on EP112 and EP125 impact exploration progress and timelines?
  • Could further impairments or asset adjustments arise from this permit sale amendment?