Why Did CSL’s Profit Collapse 80% Despite Strong Revenue?
CSL Limited reported a sharp 80% drop in net profit for the half year ended December 2025, driven by significant restructuring and impairment charges, yet maintained its growth guidance and dividend payout.
- Reported net profit after tax down 80% to US$401 million
- Underlying NPATA declined 6% to US$1.946 billion
- Restructuring and impairment expenses total US$2.06 billion
- Interim dividend maintained at US$1.30 per share
- FY26 guidance reaffirmed despite near-term profit pressures
CSL’s Financial Performance Overview
CSL Limited, Australia’s biotech giant, has unveiled its half-year results for the period ending 31 December 2025, revealing a challenging financial landscape. The company’s reported net profit after tax (NPAT) plunged 80% to US$401 million, a stark contrast to the previous year’s US$2.007 billion. This steep decline was primarily driven by significant restructuring and impairment expenses amounting to US$2.06 billion.
Despite this, CSL’s underlying net profit after tax before amortisation (NPATA) showed a more modest decline of 6%, settling at US$1.946 billion. Revenue also dipped slightly by 2% to US$8.332 billion, or 4% on a constant currency basis, reflecting both market pressures and currency fluctuations.
Restructuring and Impairments, The Cost of Transformation
The company is in the midst of a broad transformation program aimed at simplifying operations and driving future growth. Approximately 60% of targeted cost savings for the 2026 financial year have already been achieved, largely through reductions in R&D fixed costs and integration of commercial teams.
However, these initiatives have come with a hefty price tag. The US$2.06 billion in restructuring and impairment charges includes US$496 million in restructuring costs related to workforce reductions and asset rationalisation, and US$1.56 billion in impairments mainly tied to intellectual property and manufacturing assets. Notably, impairments were recorded against CSL Vifor’s Venofer product due to earlier-than-expected generic competition, and CSL Seqirus’s sa-mRNA vaccine technology, impacted by declining COVID-19 cases and tougher regulatory requirements.
Segment Performance and Strategic Investments
CSL Behring, the company’s largest segment, saw a 7% revenue decline to US$5.5 billion, with immunoglobulin sales down 6% amid Medicare reforms and competitive pressures. Haemophilia products remained stable, buoyed by growth in gene therapy sales. CSL Vifor posted a 12% revenue increase, driven by nephrology products, despite iron therapies facing generic competition. CSL Seqirus experienced a 2% revenue decline, influenced by the absence of non-recurring avian influenza outbreak revenue from the prior year.
On the investment front, CSL is expanding its US plasma manufacturing capacity with a US$1.5 billion commitment under the Horizon 2 program and has entered a strategic collaboration with Dutch biotech firm VarmX to develop novel blood coagulation treatments. Additionally, a new A$1 billion cell-based vaccine facility was opened in Melbourne, underscoring CSL’s commitment to innovation.
Balance Sheet Strength and Shareholder Returns
Despite the profit hit, CSL’s balance sheet remains robust with net assets of US$20.5 billion and a leverage ratio of 2.0 times. The company generated strong operating cash flow of US$1.3 billion during the half, supporting an expanded share buy-back program increased from US$500 million to US$750 million.
CSL declared an interim dividend of US$1.30 per share, unchanged from the prior year, signalling confidence in its cash flow and long-term prospects. The company reaffirmed its full-year guidance for 2-3% revenue growth and 4-7% underlying NPATA growth at constant currency, excluding one-off restructuring and impairment costs.
Looking Ahead
CSL’s management remains focused on navigating near-term challenges while positioning the company for sustainable growth. The transformation program is expected to deliver annual pre-tax savings of US$500-550 million by FY28. However, ongoing pressures from generic competition, regulatory changes, and the seasonal nature of vaccine sales will require careful management.
Investors will be watching closely to see how CSL balances these headwinds with its strategic investments and operational efficiencies in the coming months.
Bottom Line?
CSL’s hefty impairments and restructuring weigh heavily on profits, but the company’s strategic transformation and solid balance sheet set the stage for a pivotal second half.
Questions in the middle?
- How will CSL’s restructuring efforts impact long-term operational efficiency and profitability?
- What is the outlook for CSL Vifor’s iron therapies amid ongoing generic competition?
- Can CSL Seqirus sustain growth in its vaccine business given seasonal fluctuations and regulatory challenges?