Mayne Pharma Seeks Substantial Damages After Cosette Deal Collapse

Mayne Pharma has initiated legal proceedings against Cosette Pharmaceuticals and associated parties, seeking substantial damages following the collapse of their acquisition deal.

  • Mayne Pharma sues Cosette and partners for breach of acquisition agreement
  • Legal action filed in Supreme Court of New South Wales
  • Claims include inducement of breach against Avista and CEO David Burgstahler
  • Damages sought on behalf of Mayne Pharma and its shareholders
  • Ongoing updates promised as case progresses
An image related to MAYNE PHARMA GROUP LIMITED
Image source middle. ©

Background to the Dispute

Mayne Pharma Group Limited, a prominent Australian specialty pharmaceutical company, has taken a decisive step by commencing legal action against Cosette Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and several associated entities. This move follows the termination of a previously announced Scheme Implementation Deed (SID) that would have seen Cosette acquire Mayne Pharma. The termination, announced in December 2025, left the deal in limbo and now has escalated into a formal damages claim.

Details of the Legal Proceedings

The proceedings have been filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, with Mayne Pharma alleging that Cosette breached the terms of the SID. Additionally, Mayne Pharma accuses Avista Capital Holdings, trading as Avista Healthcare Partners, and its Managing Partner and CEO, David Burgstahler, of inducing Cosette’s breach. The pharmaceutical company is seeking substantial damages not only on its own behalf but also on behalf of its shareholders, signalling the seriousness of the dispute and its potential financial implications.

Implications for Mayne Pharma and the Market

This legal action introduces a new layer of uncertainty for Mayne Pharma’s future, particularly as it navigates the aftermath of a failed acquisition that could have reshaped its strategic direction. Investors will be watching closely for updates, as the outcome could impact shareholder value and the company’s standing within the competitive pharmaceutical sector. The involvement of Avista and its CEO adds complexity, suggesting that the dispute may extend beyond a simple contractual disagreement.

Looking Ahead

Mayne Pharma has committed to providing continuous disclosure updates as the case unfolds, ensuring transparency for the market. While the precise quantum of damages sought remains undisclosed, the litigation underscores the risks inherent in high-stakes corporate transactions. For now, the pharmaceutical community and investors alike will be keen to see how this legal battle develops and what it means for Mayne Pharma’s strategic ambitions.

Bottom Line?

The unfolding legal dispute could redefine Mayne Pharma’s trajectory and test investor confidence in its governance.

Questions in the middle?

  • What is the estimated financial impact of the damages claim on Mayne Pharma?
  • How might this legal action affect Mayne Pharma’s future acquisition or partnership opportunities?
  • What role did Avista and David Burgstahler play in the breach, and how might this influence broader industry relationships?