Terragen Holdings’ biostimulant Great Land Plus® has been independently shown to increase maize silage yields by up to 12%, translating into an estimated $1,100 additional revenue per hectare and a potential 20-fold return on investment.
- Independent Laconik trial confirms 12% yield increase in maize silage
- Estimated $1,100 additional gross revenue per hectare above standard practice
- Potential return on investment of up to 20 times at $55/ha application cost
- GLP outperformed all other treatments, including combinations with kelp extract
- 13 replicated data sets from commercial-scale trials in New South Wales
Independent Validation of GLP’s Yield Impact
Terragen Holdings Limited (ASX: TGH) has released the final report from Laconik, an independent technology enabler, confirming that its biostimulant product Great Land Plus® (GLP) significantly enhances maize silage yields. Conducted across 13 replicated data sets in a commercial grower environment in Southern Riverina, New South Wales, the trial demonstrated a 12% increase in wet tonnes per hectare compared to untreated controls.
This uplift equates to approximately 8.8 additional wet tonnes per hectare, which, when valued at $125 per wet tonne of silage maize, translates into an estimated $1,100 extra gross revenue per hectare. The trial’s robust design and statistical significance (p<0.005) underpin the credibility of these findings.
Economic Benefits and Return on Investment
Beyond yield improvements, the report highlights the economic attractiveness of GLP. With an application cost of $55 per hectare; including product, machinery, labour, and associated expenses; the estimated return on investment (ROI) reaches up to 20 times. This compelling ROI positions GLP as a cost-effective input for growers seeking to enhance productivity without substantially increasing costs.
Interestingly, GLP applied at 4 litres per hectare outperformed all other treatment variations, including combinations with kelp extract, which did not yield statistically significant improvements over untreated controls. This suggests that GLP’s formulation and application rate are optimised for maximum effect under the tested conditions.
Agronomic and Environmental Context
The trials incorporated comprehensive soil analyses prior to application, ensuring that baseline fertility was well understood. Terragen emphasises that GLP works by stimulating nutrient uptake from the soil, thereby improving both crop productivity and soil health. This dual benefit aligns with broader agricultural trends favouring sustainable intensification and reduced reliance on synthetic inputs.
While the results are promising, Terragen cautions that these outcomes are illustrative and based on current market prices and specific environmental conditions. Variability in climate, soil types, and maize market prices could influence actual results. Nonetheless, the independent nature of the Laconik report lends confidence to growers considering GLP as part of their crop management strategy.
Commercialisation Outlook
Terragen continues to advance its commercialisation efforts for GLP alongside its probiotic product for ruminants. Although no binding distribution agreements are currently in place, the positive trial results provide a strong foundation for expanding market penetration in Australia and New Zealand. The company’s focus on biological solutions that enhance productivity while supporting environmental sustainability resonates with evolving industry demands.
Investors and growers alike will be watching closely as Terragen seeks to translate these scientific validations into commercial success, potentially reshaping the biostimulant landscape in the region.
Bottom Line?
Terragen’s GLP shows strong promise as a high-ROI biostimulant, but market adoption and environmental variability remain key factors to watch.
Questions in the middle?
- Will Terragen secure binding distribution agreements to scale GLP sales?
- How will variable climatic conditions affect GLP’s performance across different regions?
- Can Terragen replicate these yield gains in other crops or broader agricultural settings?