Mandrake Identifies 1.5% Tenure Overlap with Utah Brine Corporation at Utah Lithium Project

Mandrake Resources has identified overlapping placer claims staked by Utah Brine Corporation, linked to Neometals Ltd, on its Utah Lithium Project tenure. Legal demands have been issued to resolve the dispute, which affects a small portion of Mandrake’s 3.3Mt LCE resource.

  • Mandrake owns 100% of a 3.3Mt LCE lithium brine resource in Utah
  • Utah Brine Corporation claims overlap 1.5% of Mandrake’s tenure
  • Mandrake’s US legal team demands abandonment of disputed claims
  • Neometals subsidiary involved via Utah Brine Corporation partnership
  • Mandrake reviewing legal correspondence and will update investors
An image related to Mandrake Resources Limited
Image © middle. Logo © respective owner.

Tenure Dispute Emerges on Utah Lithium Project

Mandrake Resources (ASX:MAN) is facing a legal challenge over its prized Utah Lithium Project after Utah Brine Corporation (UBC), associated with Neometals Ltd (ASX:NMT) and Omaha Value Inc., staked placer claims overlapping Mandrake’s senior tenure. The dispute concerns roughly 1.5% of Mandrake’s extensive 93,000-acre lithium brine asset, which hosts an inferred mineral resource estimated at 3.3 million tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE).

Mandrake asserts that UBC’s claims were lodged on ground not open for location and are therefore invalid. The company’s US legal representatives have demanded UBC file formal notices of abandonment for the overlapping claims and cease any mineral exploration or development activities on Mandrake’s tenure. This firm stance underscores the strategic importance Mandrake places on securing undisputed control over its lithium resource.

Strategic Implications of the Overlapping Claims

The overlap involves unpatented placer claims, a form of mining tenure that can complicate ownership in federal lands like those in Utah. Mandrake’s legal correspondence to UBC and Neometals insists on immediate abandonment of the disputed claims and prohibits entry onto the contested ground. This legal wrangling adds a layer of uncertainty to the project’s development timeline and could influence investor sentiment.

Neometals’ involvement is particularly notable given its recent binding agreement to increase its stake in UBC to 51% through its subsidiary Neometals Energy Pty Ltd. This partnership, announced in March 2026, ties Neometals directly to the contested claims. Mandrake’s efforts to resolve the dispute amicably with Neometals management have so far been unsuccessful, prompting legal action.

Mandrake’s Utah Lithium Project is positioned within a pro-mining jurisdiction with access to Tier 1 infrastructure and benefits from US government initiatives to boost domestic critical mineral supply chains. The company has previously secured substantial federal funding and strategic partnerships to advance exploration and development, including a US$1 million grant from the Department of Energy to characterise lithium brines in the Paradox Basin. This background highlights the project’s high profile and strategic value, making the tenure dispute all the more significant in the context of US efforts to secure lithium supply chains US$1 million federal funding.

Next Steps and Market Watch

Mandrake has received recent legal correspondence from UBC’s representatives concerning the claims and related oil and gas well operatorship within the project area. The company is reviewing these documents and plans to provide further updates. Investors will be watching closely for how the dispute unfolds, as any prolonged uncertainty could affect project valuation and timelines.

While the disputed claims represent a small fraction of the overall tenure, the outcome could set precedents for claim validity and operational control in this strategic lithium basin. Mandrake’s assertive legal approach aims to safeguard its position amid increasing competition for lithium assets in the US, a market seeing heightened activity from both domestic and international players.

Bottom Line?

Mandrake’s legal challenge to overlapping claims highlights tenure risks even in top-tier lithium projects, with resolution key to advancing development.

Questions in the middle?

  • How will Neometals’ increasing stake in UBC influence the dispute’s resolution?
  • Could the claim overlap delay Mandrake’s project development or financing plans?
  • What precedent might this dispute set for lithium tenure conflicts in US federal lands?