Terrain Minerals Finds Conventional Processing Pathway for Lightning Gold
Terrain Minerals has recorded gold recoveries of up to 93.7% from first-pass metallurgical testing at its Lightning Gold Project, using a conventional gravity and carbon-in-leach flowsheet. The results reduce a key technical uncertainty, although the work remains preliminary and is based on only three RC chip composites.
- Optimised recoveries of 87.0%, 92.1% and 93.7% across three composites
- Testing used a conventional P80 75-micron grind without fine grinding
- Gravity recovery reached as high as 50.8%
- No refractory or preg-robbing behaviour identified in the tested material
- Diamond-core and variability testwork remain outstanding
Conventional Flowsheet Clears Lightning’s First Processing Test
Terrain Minerals Limited (ASX:TMX) has cleared one of the more consequential early hurdles for its Lightning Gold Project, with first-pass testwork indicating the mineralisation can be treated through a standard gravity and cyanide leach circuit. Optimised overall gold recoveries reached 87.0%, 92.1% and 93.7% across three composites, with no refractory or preg-robbing behaviour identified.
The result matters because Lightning does not appear to require roasting, pressure oxidation, bio-leaching or ultra-fine grinding - processing routes that can add substantial capital and operating complexity. The tests delivered their headline results at a conventional P80 75-micron grind, a particle size used across many Western Australian gold plants.
Gravity Recovery and Reagent Changes Lift Results
Gravity recoveries ranged from 30.6% to 50.8% using a Knelson concentrator before cyanide leaching. Composite 3 produced the strongest response, with 50.8% of its gold recovered through gravity and 93.7% overall recovery under the best 48-hour conditions.
Composite 1 was the weaker performer under baseline conditions, returning 75.4% recovery at the standard grind and reagent regime. That figure rose to 87.0% after increased cyanide dosage, potentiometric titration control and the addition of 100 grams per tonne of lead nitrate. Terrain said these are routine adjustments in operating gold plants, rather than specialised treatment requirements.
The release also points to generally rapid leach kinetics, reporting optimised 24-hour recoveries of 82.1%, 91.7% and 95.3% for Composites 1, 2 and 3 respectively. However, the announcement’s tables contain a discrepancy for Composite 3: the 24-hour table reports 95.3%, while its 48-hour optimised summary reports 93.6%, below the headline 93.7% result. The company does not explain the difference in the release, leaving the underlying test-by-test data important for later study work.
RC Samples Leave Core and Variability Questions Open
The results are encouraging, but they are not yet a project-level processing design. Independent Metallurgical Operations tested 18 bottle-roll leach tests across three composites prepared from previously collected reverse-circulation chip samples. Terrain cautioned that RC material may have a finer size distribution than diamond core, potentially affecting the gravity recovery results.
That limitation is material. Bottle-roll tests also use laboratory mixing and residence conditions that may be more favourable than a commercial plant, while the three composites cannot establish metallurgical variability across the deposit. Terrain plans diamond drilling for confirmatory gravity and cyanide leach work, further reagent optimisation and broader variability testing before advancing towards a future scoping study. The company also stresses that the testwork is not a Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve estimate and does not establish economic viability.
Bottom Line?
Lightning now has a plausible conventional processing route, but the next test is whether those recoveries survive diamond-core sampling, deposit-wide variability work and commercial-scale design assumptions.
Questions in the middle?
- Will diamond-core testing confirm the strong gravity recoveries recorded from RC chip composites?
- How much will higher cyanide consumption and lead nitrate dosing affect future operating assumptions?
- Can the reported recoveries be maintained across a broader resource and support a credible scoping study?