Home › Financial Services › GLOBAL X FANG+ ETF (ASX:FAN)

FANG NAV falls more than 10% after year-end as tech exposure weakens

Financial Services By Claire Turing 3 min read

Global X FANG+ ETF reported a sharp decline in annual profit, while its net asset value fell by more than 10% after 30 June as underlying technology stocks weakened. The audited fund still grew net assets to AUD1.606 billion and declared a 235.84 cents-per-unit distribution.

  • AUD105.953 million annual profit, down from AUD288.228 million
  • Post-year-end net asset value fell by more than 10%
  • Net assets increased to AUD1.606 billion at 30 June
  • AUD112.062 million distribution declared, equal to 235.84 cents per unit
  • Ernst & Young issued an unqualified audit opinion

The most market-sensitive line in Global X FANG+ ETF’s (ASX:FANG) annual report is not the year-end profit. It is the disclosure that the fund’s net asset value has fallen by more than 10% since 30 June 2026 as the underlying NYSE FANG+ Index investments declined.

The filing does not quantify the precise fall or identify which index constituents drove it. It does say the investment strategy remains unchanged, leaving investors with a familiar but uncomfortable equation: exposure to a concentrated basket of large technology companies, and a recent mark-to-market setback that arrived after the reporting date.

Annual Profit Slumps on Investment Volatility

FANG recorded profit of AUD105.953 million for the year ended 30 June, down from AUD288.228 million a year earlier. The result was driven overwhelmingly by investment performance: net gains on financial instruments, including foreign exchange movements, fell to AUD107.791 million from AUD288.780 million.

The composition of those gains changed materially. Realised gains rose to AUD311.793 million from AUD131.633 million, but unrealised gains turned into a AUD204.002 million loss, compared with a AUD157.147 million unrealised gain in the prior year. Management fees increased to AUD5.093 million as the fund grew, while total operating expenses rose to AUD5.280 million.

Fund Growth Continues Despite the Weaker Result

At 30 June, financial assets stood at AUD1.717 billion, up from AUD1.260 billion, and net assets attributable to unitholders reached AUD1.606 billion versus AUD1.197 billion a year earlier. The expansion came with substantial investor activity: applications totalled AUD737.653 million, while redemptions reached AUD332.924 million.

The fund declared AUD112.062 million in distributions, equivalent to 235.84 cents per unit, compared with 179.62 cents a year earlier. A distribution declared on 30 June was paid on 16 July, with AUD10.096 million reinvested into additional units rather than paid in cash.

Concentrated Exposure Leaves NAV Sensitive

FANG’s entire AUD1.717 billion investment portfolio was classified as listed equity securities measured at fair value, with all holdings recorded as Level 1 assets based on quoted prices in active markets. That makes the portfolio transparent to value, but not insulated from volatility.

The fund’s sensitivity analysis estimated that a 10% move in the value of its listed investments would alter net assets by AUD171.677 million. A separate 10% currency move would have had an AUD172.528 million impact in the analysis, reflecting the fund’s predominantly US-dollar exposure when measured in Australian dollars.

Ernst & Young gave the financial report an unqualified opinion and identified investment existence and valuation as the key audit matter. The auditor noted that the portfolio represented 99.29% of total assets at year-end. The report therefore provides assurance over the accounts, not protection against the market movements that have already reduced the fund’s post-year-end NAV.

Bottom Line?

The next meaningful data point is the fund’s subsequent NAV and unit-price performance: the report confirms a decline of more than 10%, but not how far the damage has extended or whether it has stabilised.

Questions in the middle?

  • What was the exact percentage decline in NAV after 30 June, and has the fall continued?
  • Which NYSE FANG+ Index holdings contributed most to the post-year-end decline?
  • Have the recent market moves changed redemption flows, spreads or the fund’s ability to track its index?