Global X critical metals ETF turns market gains into AUD2.273 million profit

Global X Rare Earth and Critical Metals ETF delivered a sharp lift in audited profit for the year ended 30 June 2026, while net assets more than tripled as investors added capital. The result was driven mainly by realised gains on listed critical-metals equities, alongside a distribution of 112.44 cents per unit.

  • AUD2.273 million profit, up from AUD319,000
  • Net assets increased to AUD11.460 million
  • AUD14.120 million of applications exceeded AUD7.035 million of redemptions
  • AUD1.012 million distribution declared, or 112.44 cents per unit
  • Portfolio remained fully invested in listed equities and exposed to price and currency swings
An image related to GLOBAL X RARE EARTH AND CRITICAL METALS ETF
Image © middle. Logo © respective owner.

The critical-metals trade delivered a markedly larger result for Global X Rare Earth and Critical Metals ETF (ASX:GMTL) in the year to 30 June 2026, with audited profit rising to AUD2.273 million from AUD319,000. The fund, formerly known as Global X Green Metal Miners ETF, also ended the year with AUD11.460 million in net assets, up from AUD3.113 million.

Realised Gains Drove the Year

The headline profit was overwhelmingly investment-driven. Net gains on financial instruments, including foreign exchange movements, reached AUD2.264 million, compared with AUD305,000 a year earlier. That figure comprised AUD2.937 million of realised gains, partly offset by AUD673,000 of net unrealised losses.

Dividend and distribution income added AUD93,000, while total operating expenses rose to AUD93,000 from AUD25,000. Management fees were AUD58,000, calculated at 0.69% a year inclusive of GST and net of applicable reduced input tax credits.

Assets Expanded Alongside Investor Flows

Capital flows were a significant part of the fund’s expansion. Unitholders applied AUD14.120 million during the year, while redemptions totalled AUD7.035 million. After investment performance and distributions, units on issue increased from 400,000 to 900,000.

The fund declared AUD1.012 million in distributions for the year, equivalent to 112.44 cents per unit. The distribution was paid to entitled unitholders on 16 July 2026, after the reporting date. At 30 June, distributions payable represented almost all of the fund’s AUD1.020 million in total liabilities.

Portfolio Risk Remains Concentrated

The fund’s AUD12.438 million investment portfolio consisted entirely of listed equity securities classified as Level 1 fair-value assets. Its mandate is to track the BITA Rare Earth and Critical Metals Index before fees and expenses by holding the index constituents in closely aligned weights.

That structure leaves the result highly sensitive to market movements. The fund’s sensitivity analysis estimated that a 10% change in portfolio prices would affect net assets by AUD1.244 million, while a 10% currency move would produce an estimated AUD1.194 million impact. The report also notes that future returns are not guaranteed and that market prices on the ASX depend on supply, demand and bid-offer spreads.

Audit Found No Qualification

Ernst & Young issued an unmodified audit opinion. Investment existence and valuation were identified as the key audit matter because the portfolio represented 99.66% of total assets; the auditor confirmed holdings and cash with third parties and checked investment prices against independent market sources.

The filing records no significant post-year-end event beyond the distribution payment, and provides no forward return guidance. The next useful test is whether the fund’s enlarged asset base and strong realised result can persist when the performance of rare-earth and critical-metals equities is measured against its index rather than against the unusually low prior-year base.

Bottom Line?

The fund is larger and more profitable, but its next result will remain tightly linked to listed critical-metals prices, currency movements and investor flows.

Questions in the middle?

  • Can GMTL match its index after fees as the enlarged portfolio moves through a different market period?
  • Will the AUD14.120 million of annual applications translate into sustained asset growth, or were flows concentrated around a particular market phase?
  • How much of the 2026 profit and distribution profile can be repeated without another strong round of realised investment gains?