Home › Funds Management › MACQUARIE SUBORDINATED DEBT ACTIVE ETF (ASX:MQS)

Macquarie debt fund finds momentum as ETF assets surge past A$872 million

Funds Management By Victor Sage 3 min read

Macquarie Subordinated Debt Fund (ASX:MQS) reported a sharp increase in operating profit and assets for the year ended 30 June 2026, powered by the expansion of its active ETF class. The audited accounts also show the fund’s returns remain closely exposed to interest rates, credit spreads and debt-market valuations.

  • Operating profit rose to A$23.537 million from A$3.395 million
  • Total assets increased to A$887.608 million from A$178.002 million
  • Debt securities accounted for A$873.780 million of assets
  • A$23.856 million was paid or declared in distributions
  • Ernst & Young issued an unqualified audit opinion

Macquarie Subordinated Debt Fund (ASX:MQS) ended the 2026 financial year with almost five times the asset base it held a year earlier, as its active ETF class attracted substantial applications and operating profit climbed to A$23.537 million. Total assets reached A$887.608 million at 30 June, up from A$178.002 million, with debt securities making up A$873.780 million of the portfolio.

Profit growth follows ETF expansion

The result was driven predominantly by interest income and valuation gains on financial instruments held at fair value through profit or loss. That line produced a net gain of A$24.126 million, including A$23.461 million of interest income, compared with A$3.281 million a year earlier. After management fees of A$1.127 million, the fund reported operating profit of A$23.537 million, against A$3.395 million in 2025.

The balance-sheet expansion was concentrated in the Macquarie Subordinated Debt Active ETF. Applications into that class totalled A$779.416 million during the year, while its net assets rose to A$872.933 million from A$94.098 million. By contrast, the unquoted class ended the year with net assets of just A$79,000 after A$77.837 million of redemptions, down from A$75.615 million.

Distributions rise with the asset base

The fund paid or declared A$23.856 million in distributions, compared with A$3.359 million in the prior year. The active ETF accounted for A$22.499 million of that amount, while its reported distribution per unit increased to 268.50 cents from 125.00 cents. The figures reflect a much larger ETF asset base as well as the income generated by its debt portfolio; they do not, by themselves, establish a forward distribution rate.

Management fees charged to the ETF were set at 0.29% of net asset value, inclusive of GST and net of available reduced input tax credits. The accounts also disclose A$98.596 million of debt securities issued by Macquarie Bank, alongside A$2.783 million invested in the related Macquarie Treasury Fund. Those related-party exposures are disclosed in the audited report and were held at fair value.

Credit spreads remain the main sensitivity

The portfolio’s growth has not removed its fixed-income risks. The fund held securities rated from A- through BB+, with the largest exposures rated A- and BBB+. Its sensitivity analysis estimated that a 25-basis-point increase in interest rates would reduce the fair value of investments by about A$5.740 million, while a 25-basis-point fall in credit spreads would increase fair value by about A$5.740 million, all other variables held constant. The report cautions that actual outcomes may differ materially from the analysis.

Ernst & Young identified the existence and valuation of the investment portfolio as the key audit matter, noting that debt securities represented 98.4% of total assets. The auditor issued an unqualified opinion, while the directors said no significant post-year-end events, contingent liabilities or commitments had arisen. A new director, M Aubrey, was appointed to the responsible entity on 9 July 2026.

Bottom Line?

The fund has achieved rapid scale through its ETF, but the next test is whether distributions and asset growth can persist through less favourable rate and credit-spread conditions.

Questions in the middle?

  • How will the ETF’s distribution profile change if interest rates or credit spreads move against the portfolio?
  • Will the active ETF continue to attract applications at a pace that offsets redemptions from the unquoted class?
  • How concentrated will the portfolio remain in Macquarie-related and similarly rated debt securities as assets grow?