Western Mines Group has increased the Mulga Tank resource to 2.647 billion tonnes at 0.27% nickel, containing 7.2 million tonnes of nickel. The major exploration milestone now faces its more consequential test: whether a large, low-grade and unconstrained resource can support an economic mine.
- 2,647Mt resource at 0.27% nickel
- 7.2Mt contained nickel, plus cobalt, copper and PGEs
- Indicated tonnes increased 98% after 32 additional holes
- ERM independently reviewed the JORC 2012 estimate
- Scoping Study due to test mining and processing assumptions
Mulga Tank resource reaches 7.2Mt of contained nickel
Western Mines Group Ltd (ASX:WMG) has more than doubled the contained nickel headline at its Mulga Tank project, reporting a 2,647 million tonne Mineral Resource Estimate at 0.27% nickel. The resource contains 7.2 million tonnes of nickel, alongside 347,000 tonnes of cobalt, 205,000 tonnes of copper and 1.6 million ounces of platinum and palladium.
The estimate covers shallow disseminated nickel sulphide mineralisation in the main dunite body of the Mulga Tank Ultramafic Complex in Western Australia’s Eastern Goldfields. It is reported at a 0.20% nickel cut-off and comprises 1,121Mt in the Indicated category at 0.28% nickel and 1,526Mt Inferred at 0.27% nickel.
32 drilling holes upgrade the resource
The update incorporates 32 Phase 4 and Phase 5 holes totalling 9,634 metres. The company said the drilling increased Indicated resource tonnes by 98%, while higher-grade tonnes above a 0.32% nickel cut-off rose by 80% in the Indicated category and 18% across the total resource.
The result follows Phase 5 drilling results, which reported broad nickel sulphide intersections alongside cobalt, copper and platinum-group elements. Western Mines said the latest modelling focuses on an approximately 3.7 kilometre by 2.0 kilometre area and excludes nickel in the oxidised and transitional zones.
Large scale, low grade and still unconstrained
There is an important qualification beneath the headline tonnage. The estimate is unconstrained, meaning it has not been limited by an open-pit shell, and the company cautions that a pit-constrained resource could produce materially different figures. The mineralisation is considered shallow and potentially amenable to open-pit mining, but that remains a development concept rather than an established project outcome.
Western Mines is working on a Scoping Study based on a potential operation processing 20Mt to 40Mt of ore each year. Preliminary flotation testing has recovered nickel sulphides from all tests conducted so far, but the company is currently assuming a 40% to 45% recovery range until more extensive metallurgical work is completed. Those assumptions, along with capital and operating costs, will determine how much of the contained metal can translate into an investable project.
Independent review and the next economic test
Independent consultant ERM reviewed the data inputs, interpretation and estimation methodology and concluded they were reasonable and acceptable for reporting a JORC 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate. That supports the classification of the resource; it does not amount to a feasibility study or establish commercial viability.
Western Mines Managing Director Dr Caedmon Marriott described Mulga Tank as potentially Australia’s largest nickel sulphide deposit and among the world’s top 10, but those ranking claims are the company’s own assessment. The more useful comparison will arrive with the Scoping Study, which is expected to test pit-constrained tonnes, mining rates, recoveries, capital requirements and operating costs. Until then, the project has scale in abundance, while its economic case remains a work in progress.
Bottom Line?
The resource scale has moved ahead sharply, but the next valuation test is whether preliminary recovery and cost assumptions survive a pit-constrained Scoping Study.
Questions in the middle?
- How much of the 2,647Mt resource will remain within a realistic open-pit shell?
- Can further metallurgical work improve on the preliminary 40% to 45% recovery assumption?
- What capital intensity and funding requirement will emerge from a 20Mt to 40Mt per year development concept?