Home › Healthcare › Resonance Health (ASX:RHT)

Resonance Health sees promising MRI signal for liver fibrosis device

Healthcare By Ada Torres 4 min read

Resonance Health has reported encouraging preliminary results from an investigational MRI software device that identifies liver fibrosis without additional scanner hardware. The early data are promising, but the model remains unverified and regulatory clearance is still ahead.

  • AUROC of 0.82 for significant fibrosis and 0.79 for advanced fibrosis
  • Preliminary analysis covered 50 biopsy-confirmed subjects from one Chinese site
  • No additional MRI hardware or software is required at the imaging site
  • Full 68-subject analysis and model refinement are next
  • FibrosisAssessment remains investigational and uncleared

Resonance Health Ltd (ASX:RHT) has found what it describes as a clear fibrosis signal in standard MRI scans, reporting an AUROC of 0.82 for significant liver fibrosis and 0.79 for advanced disease. The result comes from an initial analysis of 50 biopsy-confirmed subjects and gives the company an early clinical foundation for FibrosisAssessment, an investigational software device aimed at liver disease and drug trials.

Preliminary MRI results show a usable fibrosis signal

Image © Resonance Health Limited. From “Liver Fibrosis Device Webinar Presentation”, 28 Oct 2026.

The model correctly identified 75.0% of subjects with significant fibrosis, defined as stage F2 or higher, while excluding 80.0% of those below that threshold. For advanced fibrosis, defined as F3 or higher, sensitivity was lower at 57.9%, but specificity reached 93.5%. The analysis used 3T MRI scans from 40 subjects with F2-F4 disease for the significant-fibrosis endpoint and 19 subjects with F3-F4 disease for the advanced-fibrosis endpoint.

Those figures are not a regulatory result or a head-to-head comparison with competing tests. The cohort came from a single site in China, included a broad mix of clinical conditions including liver cancer, and the analysis has not been independently verified. The confidence intervals are consequently wide, particularly around the small group without significant fibrosis. Resonance said the read-out was based on a first-pass model with intentionally limited parameters.

The commercial case starts with clinical trials

Image © Resonance Health Limited. From “Liver Fibrosis Device Webinar Presentation”, 28 Oct 2026.

Resonance is positioning the device as an additional read from MRI scans that many GLP-1, MASH, metabolic and obesity trials already perform. It says FibrosisAssessment would use standard 1.5T or 3T MRI sequences and central-lab analysis, with no added hardware or software at the imaging site. The company’s proposed entry point is investigational use in pharmaceutical trials, where a fibrosis read could complement existing liver-fat, liver-iron and body-composition measurements.

The opportunity has been partly funded by the $6 million placement, but the filing does not report revenue from the fibrosis device and explicitly excludes any such revenue from FY27 guidance. Resonance’s presentation uses illustrative pricing of US$900 to US$1,500 per scan, not forecasts, and estimates that a Phase 3 MASH trial could generate US$3.6 million to US$6.0 million in scan revenue under its assumed patient and visit numbers.

Full study analysis and FDA guidance remain ahead

The next technical step is to analyse all 68 enrolled subjects, complete independent pathology review and refine the model using data already collected. Resonance says no new study or additional data collection is needed for that refinement, although the final model will still require testing on independent datasets before any pivotal validation.

The company’s stated regulatory sequence runs through an FDA Pre-Submission process, investigational trial use, pivotal validation and then a potential 510(k), De Novo or Biomarker Qualification pathway, depending on FDA feedback. Commercial access will also depend on trial sponsors adopting the read-out. Resonance has identified future pilot work through its IAG imaging alliance, but the presentation says first work orders and investigational-use contracts remain future catalysts rather than secured revenue.

Bottom Line?

The result gives FibrosisAssessment a credible starting point, but the investment case now turns on replication beyond the 50-subject single-site analysis and a workable FDA pathway.

Questions in the middle?

  • Will the full 68-subject analysis preserve or improve the reported AUROC and specificity?
  • Can the model’s advanced-fibrosis performance be replicated in independent datasets and pivotal validation?
  • When will pharmaceutical sponsors convert the proposed GLP-1 trial opportunity into paid investigational-use contracts?

Sources